Indovina v. Hyers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Indovina v. Hyers

152 N.W. 321, 98 Neb. 140, 1915 Neb. LEXIS 172

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 1915

DocketNo. 18438

StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.W. 321 (Indovina v. Hyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indovina v. Hyers, 152 N.W. 321, 98 Neb. 140, 1915 Neb. LEXIS 172 (Neb. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Letton, J.

The facts in this case are similar to those in In re Arrigo, ante, p. 134, except that the package was labeled to show that it contained crackerjack, the net weight was given as 2 ounces, and on one side of the package was printed: “PRIZE. This package contains a pleasing novelty or toy to delight the children, in addition to the famous confection, crackerjack.” The package contained a toy bank in addition to the food.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is

Reversed.

Barnes, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Letton, J.

The facts in this case are similar to those in In re Arrigo, ante, p. 134, except that the package was labeled to show that it contained crackerjack, the net weight was given as 2 ounces, and on one side of the package was printed: “PRIZE. This package contains a pleasing novelty or toy to delight the children, in addition to the famous confection, crackerjack.” The package contained a toy bank in addition to the food.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is

Reversed.

Barnes, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 N.W. 321, 98 Neb. 140, 1915 Neb. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indovina-v-hyers-neb-1915.