Indosuez International Finance B.V. v. National Reserve Bank

263 A.D.2d 384, 693 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7817
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered May 3, 1999, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin defendant from prosecuting an action it had commenced against plaintiff in Russia, or from instituting any other such actions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction since the doctrine of comity militates against staying proceedings previously commenced in a foreign court of competent jurisdiction (see, Sarepa, S.A. v Pepsico, Inc., 225 AD2d 604), and the additional expense and trouble of litigating in a foreign court is insufficient to warrant an injunction (see, Paramount Pictures v Blumenthal, 256 App Div 756, 760, appeal dismissed 281 NY 682).

Motion seeking to find defendant guilty of contempt of court and for other related relief denied. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Indosuez International Finance B.V. v. National Reserve Bank, 263 A.D.2d 384, 693 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

263 A.D.2d 384 (Indosuez International Finance B.V. v. National Reserve Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Cohen
5 Misc. 3d 869 (New York Surrogate's Court, 2004)