Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Morganstern
103 Ill. 149
Opinion
The bond appears to have been executed
under the seal of the corporation. This raises the presumption that the person using the seal had authority to do so. There is no attempt to impeach the authority, nor is it claimed the seal of the corporation has been improperly used.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Morganstern, 103 Ill. 149 (Ill. 1882).
103 Ill. 149 (Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Morganstern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. Browning
120 S.E. 247 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1923)
Sibly v. England
119 S.W. 820 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
West Side Auction House Co. v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
57 N.E. 839 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1900)
Burnett v. Lyford
28 P. 855 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Joliet Electric Light & Power Co. v. Ingalls
23 Ill. App. 45 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)