Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. Sparr

15 Ind. 440, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 474
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Ind. 440 (Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. Sparr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. Sparr, 15 Ind. 440, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 474 (Ind. 1860).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit by the appellee* against 'the appellant, to recover damages for the hilling of a horse, by the locomotive and cars of the company, upon the railroad track. The suit was instituted in the Court of Common Pleas, and the complaint alleges neither carelessness on the part of the agents of the company, nor that the road was not properly fenced. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and exception taken. Judgment for the plaintiff.

This judgment can not be sustained. The complaint should have shown that the horse was killed through the negligence of the company, or that the railroad was not properly fenced.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause re manded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Taylor
17 Kan. 566 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Ind. 440, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-pittsburgh-cleveland-railroad-v-sparr-ind-1860.