Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Goar

62 Ind. 411
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Biddle, J.

Complaint against the appellant, by the appellee, for killing a steer on the track of the appellant’s; railroad, where it was not securely fenced, by running upon and over the steer with a train of cars.

Demurrer to the evidence; judgment for the appellee.

The sufficiency of the evidence is the only question presented. On a demurrer to evidence, its fair weight, and. all reasonable inferences from it, fall against the party demurring. McCreary v. Fike, 2 Blackf. 374; Greggs v. Seeley, 8 Ind. 264; The City of Indianapolis v. Lawyer, 38 Ind. 348; Lindley v. Kelley, 42 Ind. 294; Strough v. Gear, 48 Ind. 100; Holmes v. The Phœnix M. L. Ins. Co., 49 Ind. 356; Pinnell v. Stringer, 59 Ind. 555.

Under this rule, upon examination, we are convinced! that the evidence fully supports the judgment, which is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Goar, 62 Ind. 411 (Ind. 1878).

62 Ind. 411 (Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Goar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fritz v. Clark
80 Ind. 591 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Baker v. Baker
69 Ind. 399 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)