Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Wharton

13 Ind. 509
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 13 Ind. 509 (Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Wharton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Wharton, 13 Ind. 509 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Wharton sued the Indianapolis and .Cincinnati Railroad Company to recover for stock killed upon the road by the locomoiives -of the company. The suit was instituted before a justice of the peace.

The complaint alleged that the stock was killed at a point where the road was not fenced. It contained no allegations of other negligence of the company.

The cause went, by appeal, to the Common Pleas. In that Court there was judgment for the plaintiff.

The record contains all the evidence. There was nó proof that the road was not fenced, or of any negligence, in running the locomotives, on the part of the company.

We do not mean to admit that there could legally have been proof, under the complaint, of such negligence. The judgment is not supported by the evidence. The allega[510]*510tion that the road was not fenced was a material one— one on which, after the fact of killing was proved, the plaintiff’s case rested. "Without proving that allegation, he made out no case. As there was no proof going to establish the truth of that allegation, the judgment must be reversed.

J. S. Scobey, for the appellants. J. B. McFadden, for the appellee.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Taylor
17 Kan. 566 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1877)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hackney
53 Ind. 488 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad v. Brown
44 Ind. 409 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette R. R. v. Robinson
35 Ind. 380 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. Williams
15 Ind. 486 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ind. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-cincinnati-railroad-v-wharton-ind-1859.