Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Stark

Indiana Supreme Court

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Stark

31 Ind. 149

DecidedMay 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ind. 149 (Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Stark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Stark, 31 Ind. 149 (Ind. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, C. J.

This was a suit against the railroad company to recover the value of a quantity of wood destroyed [150]*150by'fire at Kew.Point, in Decatur county. The facts in the case and the questions presented are substantially the same •as in the immediately preceding case of the same railroad company v. Paramore, and the judgment is reversed for the same reasons given in that case.

U. J. Hammond, and L. Howland, for appellant. B. W. Wilson, J. Gavin, J. I>. Milter, and W. II. Carrol, for appellees.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, C. J.

This was a suit against the railroad company to recover the value of a quantity of wood destroyed [150]*150by'fire at Kew.Point, in Decatur county. The facts in the case and the questions presented are substantially the same •as in the immediately preceding case of the same railroad company v. Paramore, and the judgment is reversed for the same reasons given in that case.

U. J. Hammond, and L. Howland, for appellant. B. W. Wilson, J. Gavin, J. I>. Milter, and W. II. Carrol, for appellees.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Ind. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-cincinnati-railroad-v-stark-ind-1869.