Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Brinkman

Indiana Supreme Court

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Brinkman

20 Ind. 230

DecidedMay 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ind. 230 (Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Brinkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Brinkman, 20 Ind. 230 (Ind. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The same question is presented in this as in that of the same appellant against Wilsey, at this term, [supra,] in relation to refusal of the Court to dismiss the cause because of the failure of the justice to record the cause of action in full length.

Thomas A. Hendricks, Oscar B. Hord, and Scobey Sf Pound, for the appellant. B. L. Walpole, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The same question is presented in this as in that of the same appellant against Wilsey, at this term, [supra,] in relation to refusal of the Court to dismiss the cause because of the failure of the justice to record the cause of action in full length.

Thomas A. Hendricks, Oscar B. Hord, and Scobey Sf Pound, for the appellant. B. L. Walpole, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ind. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-cincinnati-railroad-v-brinkman-ind-1863.