Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Adkins

23 Ind. 345
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Ind. 345 (Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Adkins, 23 Ind. 345 (Ind. 1864).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

Adkins sued the railroad company, under the statute, to recover the value of a horse and colt, killed by the locomotive and train of the company where the [346]*346roacl passes through the land of John Whitlow. Answer in denial; trial by jury; verdict for the plaintiff; motion for new trial by defendant overruled; and judgment on the verdict of the jury.

Thomas A. Hendricks, Oscar B. Iiord, and Gortez Ewing, for appellant. John S. Scobey, for appellee.

The animals for which this suit is brought were killed at the same time as those in the case of the same Railroad Company v. Robert Adkins, decided at the present term of this court;' and the same questions precisely arise in this case on the pleadings, evideuce, and instructions asked and refused by the court, and motion for new trial, as in that case. This case is therefore reversed for the same reasons given iu that.

Judgment reversed, with costs', and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
13 N.E. 263 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Ind. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-cincinnati-railroad-v-adkins-ind-1864.