Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette Railroad v. Trisler
This text of 30 Ind. 243 (Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette Railroad v. Trisler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is here upon the evidence. The [244]*244evidence upon one point was not, as it is given to us by a bill of exceptions, of the most satisfactory character. There was, however, evidence sufficient to put it out of our power to interfere.
The appellant argues the ease as if this court were to weigh the evidence and determine the preponderance thereof. Such is not our province. It must appear by the record, not merely that. the finding below was against the weight of evidence, hut that that finding was wrong beyond any question whatever, before we can interfere upon the evidence alone.
The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages, and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ind. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-cincinnati-lafayette-railroad-v-trisler-ind-1868.