Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Reed

52 Ind. 357
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Ind. 357 (Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Reed, 52 Ind. 357 (Ind. 1876).

Opinion

Pettit, J.

This was an attempt by the appellees, under the fifteenth section of the act of May 11th, 1852, 1 G. & H. 509, to assess damages against the appellant for the construction of its road over and through the lands of the appellees. The railroad company had not fixed [filed] any instrument of appropriation, and until that was done the land-owners could not take any steps under the acts above cited. Its very terms preclude such a construction. The demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, as also the motion to dismiss the proceedings. We have a statute, 2 G. & H. 315, sec. 706, etc., under which either party may have an assessment of damages, but the proceedings under the two statutes are very different. Under the former, three appraisers are to be appointed, who are to act, etc.; while under the latter, there is to be a jury empanelled, of not less than six or more than twelve, sworn by the sheriff, etc.

The judgment is reversed, at the costs of the appellees, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the petition, and to dismiss the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Anderson v. Kernodle
54 Ind. 314 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ind. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-bloomington-western-railway-co-v-reed-ind-1876.