Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop

Mississippi Supreme Court

Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop

83 So. 276, 120 Miss. 872

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1919

DocketNo. 20905

StatusPublished

This text of 83 So. 276 (Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop, 83 So. 276, 120 Miss. 872 (Mich. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Holden, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is not important to state the facts. The amount of "damages recovered is grossly excessive, and most of which were not occasioned directly by the attachment. Marqueze v. Southeimer, 59 Miss. 430.

If remittitur is entered, reducing the amount to two hundred and fifty dollars, the jugment will he affirmed; otherwise, reversed generally.

Affirmed Conditionally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI