Inderjit Kaur v. Jefferson Sessions

682 F. App'x 574

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: March 16, 2017
• Docket: 14-73434
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Inderjit Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) final order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision to deny Kaur’s application for a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(1). See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). Knur fails to raise a col-orable constitutional claim or question of law to invoke our jurisdiction. See Corona-Mendez v. Holder, 593 F.3d 1143, 1146 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court has jurisdiction to review a discretionary determination only if it involves constitutional claims or questions of law); Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (a claim that the agency did not properly weigh hardship evidence does not state a color-able due process claim); De Mercado v. Mukasey, 566 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir. 2009) (evaluating hardship to a qualifying relative necessarily implicates family unity, and to carve out an exception to lack of jurisdiction would “swallow the rule itself’).

In light of this decision, we need not reach Kaur’s contentions regarding the Id’s credibility finding.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.