Independent Veteran Cabs v. Neill
This text of 244 F.2d 718 (Independent Veteran Cabs v. Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
244 F.2d 718
INDEPENDENT VETERAN CABS, Incorporated, Appellant,
v.
Tead T. NEILL, Individually, and for the use and benefit of
her miner children, Shirley Neill Brandon and John Neill,
Ford Construction Company, Coastal Contractors,
Incorporated, Coastal Asphalt Company, Forrest N. Holloway, Appellees.
No. 12910.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
March 22, 1957.
Irwin, Dunlap & Leffler, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.
Canale, Glankler, Montedonico, Boone & Loch, and Armstrong, McCadden, Allen, Braden & Goodman, Memphis, Tenn., for appellees.
Before McALLISTER, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court; and it appearing that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in permitting appellee Neill to dismiss her complaint, without prejudice; and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Boyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 F.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-veteran-cabs-v-neill-ca6-1957.