Independent Veteran Cabs v. Neill

244 F.2d 718
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 1957
Docket12910_1
StatusPublished

This text of 244 F.2d 718 (Independent Veteran Cabs v. Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Independent Veteran Cabs v. Neill, 244 F.2d 718 (6th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

244 F.2d 718

INDEPENDENT VETERAN CABS, Incorporated, Appellant,
v.
Tead T. NEILL, Individually, and for the use and benefit of
her miner children, Shirley Neill Brandon and John Neill,
Ford Construction Company, Coastal Contractors,
Incorporated, Coastal Asphalt Company, Forrest N. Holloway, Appellees.

No. 12910.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 22, 1957.

Irwin, Dunlap & Leffler, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

Canale, Glankler, Montedonico, Boone & Loch, and Armstrong, McCadden, Allen, Braden & Goodman, Memphis, Tenn., for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court; and it appearing that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in permitting appellee Neill to dismiss her complaint, without prejudice; and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Boyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 F.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-veteran-cabs-v-neill-ca6-1957.