Independent U.S. Tanker Owners Committee v. Skinner

901 F.2d 1116, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 64, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14392
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 9, 1990·No. Nos. 88-5313, Civ. A. 87-1685 and Civ. A. 87-2102·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s motion to recall and modify the mandate, the responses thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED by the court that the motion to recall and modify the mandate be granted. See Dilley v. Alexander, 627 F.2d 407, 410-11 (D.C.Cir.1980). It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in these cases be reversed, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed August 22, 1989 (884 F.2d 587 (D.C.Cir.1989)) and these cases be remanded to the District Court for resolution of appellees’ National Environmental Policy Act claims.

The Clerk is directed to issue, forthwith, a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Independent U.S. Tanker Owners Committee v. Skinner, 901 F.2d 1116, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 64, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14392 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

901 F.2d 1116 (Independent U.S. Tanker Owners Committee v. Skinner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. v. Skinner
767 F. Supp. 287 (District of Columbia, 1991)