Independent School District No. 1 v. Continental Oil Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Independent School District No. 1 v. Continental Oil Co.

286 P. 360, 49 Idaho 109, 1930 Ida. LEXIS 76

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 22, 1930

DocketNo. 5269.

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 286 P. 360 (Independent School District No. 1 v. Continental Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Independent School District No. 1 v. Continental Oil Co., 286 P. 360, 49 Idaho 109, 1930 Ida. LEXIS 76 (Idaho 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

VARIAN, J.-

In this case, the trial judge held Ordinance No. 322 of the city of Twin Falls invalid in so far as it applies to Block B, original town site of Twin Falls, Idaho, owned by respondent. The fundamental question involved *110 here is the validity of said ordinance. That question was decided adversely to. appellant’s contention in the case of Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin Falls (No. 5268), ante, p. 89, 286 Pac. 353, wherein said ordinance is held to be unreasonable in its application to said Block B, and void as being discriminatory. It is therefore thought not necessary to consider the motion to dismiss the appeal, or the several assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Givens, C. J., and Budge and Lee, JJ., concur. McNaughton, J., did not sit at the hearing and took no part in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VARIAN, J.-

In this case, the trial judge held Ordinance No. 322 of the city of Twin Falls invalid in so far as it applies to Block B, original town site of Twin Falls, Idaho, owned by respondent. The fundamental question involved *110 here is the validity of said ordinance. That question was decided adversely to. appellant’s contention in the case of Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin Falls (No. 5268), ante, p. 89, 286 Pac. 353, wherein said ordinance is held to be unreasonable in its application to said Block B, and void as being discriminatory. It is therefore thought not necessary to consider the motion to dismiss the appeal, or the several assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Givens, C. J., and Budge and Lee, JJ., concur. McNaughton, J., did not sit at the hearing and took no part in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 P. 360, 49 Idaho 109, 1930 Ida. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-school-district-no-1-v-continental-oil-co-idaho-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack