Independent Insurance v. Thomas
This text of 104 Mass. 192 (Independent Insurance v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The supreme court cf the United States has decided that, under the statutes of the United States, when it [193]*193appears to be the clear intent of a contract that payment or satisfaction shall be made in gold or silver, damages should be assessed and judgment rendered accordingly, and that the state courts of common law, as well as the courts of the United States, are bound to render such specific judgments. Bronson v. Rodes, 7 Wallace, 229. Butler v. Horwitz, Ib. 258. As that court has final jurisdiction in the matter, it is the duty of the courts of this Commonwealth to conform to its decision. In this case, the debt being payable in gold, a specific judgment should be rendered for gold coin, and execution should be issued accordingly. Exceptions sustained
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 Mass. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-insurance-v-thomas-mass-1870.