Independent District v. Apperle

40 N.W. 823, 76 Iowa 238, 1888 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 20, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 N.W. 823 (Independent District v. Apperle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Independent District v. Apperle, 40 N.W. 823, 76 Iowa 238, 1888 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 184 (iowa 1888).

Opinion

Robinson, J.

— The plaintiff has filed in this court an abstract, which shows on its face that an appeal was duly taken by the serving of a notice thereof on the defendants and the clerk of the district court of Lyon county. The defendants have filed an additional abstract, which shows that no notice of appeal was ever served on the clerk, and a motion to dismiss the cftuse for want of such service. The additional abstract is not denied by plaintiff, and is corroborated by the transcript. “An appeal is taken by the service of a notice [239]*239in writing on the adverse party, * * * and also upon the clerk of the court wherein' the proceedings were had, stating the appeal from the same. * * *” Code, sec. 3178. It appears that no appeal has been taken in this cause, and it is therefore

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Farrell v. Clossner
51 N.W. 16 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 N.W. 823, 76 Iowa 238, 1888 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-district-v-apperle-iowa-1888.