Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd.
This text of Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd. (Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-07-00724-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
PDLR INVESTMENTS, LTD., ASSIGNEE IN INTEREST OF LA MANSION DEL PASEO, LTD., APPELLEE. _____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Independent Contractors, Inc., appealed a judgment rendered against
it in the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On February 6, 2008, the Clerk
of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due
on December 31, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The
Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct
the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was
advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this
notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On February 14, 2008, the
Clerk sent appellant a similar notice regarding appellant’s failure to make arrangements
for payment of the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has failed to respond to the Court’s
notices.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to
respond to the Court’s notices, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See
id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 17thday of April, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-contractors-inc-v-pdlr-investments-ltd-texapp-2008.