Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 2008
Docket13-07-00724-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd. (Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00724-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

PDLR INVESTMENTS, LTD., ASSIGNEE IN INTEREST OF LA MANSION DEL PASEO, LTD., APPELLEE. _____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Independent Contractors, Inc., appealed a judgment rendered against

it in the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On February 6, 2008, the Clerk

of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due

on December 31, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The

Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct

the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was

advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this

notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On February 14, 2008, the

Clerk sent appellant a similar notice regarding appellant’s failure to make arrangements

for payment of the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has failed to respond to the Court’s

notices.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

respond to the Court’s notices, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See

id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 17thday of April, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Independent Contractors, Inc. v. Pdlr Investments, Ltd., Assignee in Interest of La Mansion Del Paseo, Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/independent-contractors-inc-v-pdlr-investments-ltd-texapp-2008.