Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.
163 P. 60, 174 Cal. 315, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 792
Opinion
The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].
We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.
The application for a writ of review is denied.
Rehearing denied. *Page 316
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm., 163 P. 60, 174 Cal. 315, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 792 (Cal. 1917).
163 P. 60 (Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carrigan v. California State Legislature
263 F.2d 560 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission
267 P. 922 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
234 P. 317 (California Supreme Court, 1925)
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission
231 P. 996 (California Supreme Court, 1924)
McFeely v. Industrial Accident Commission
223 P. 413 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
Reid v. Automatic Electric Washer Co.
189 Iowa 964 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1920)
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
181 P. 788 (California Supreme Court, 1919)
Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.
177 P. 273 (California Supreme Court, 1918)