Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.

California Supreme Court

Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.

163 P. 60, 174 Cal. 315, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 792

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 29, 1917

DocketL. A. No. 5098.

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 163 P. 60 (Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm., 163 P. 60, 174 Cal. 315, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 792 (Cal. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].

We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.

The application for a writ of review is denied.

Rehearing denied. *Page 316

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].

We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.

The application for a writ of review is denied.

Rehearing denied. *Page 316

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 P. 60, 174 Cal. 315, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indemnity-co-v-industrial-acc-comm-cal-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack