Indelicato v. State

854 So. 2d 834, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2003 WL 22148862
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 2003
DocketNo. 5D02-3570
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 854 So. 2d 834 (Indelicato v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Indelicato v. State, 854 So. 2d 834, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2003 WL 22148862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Anthony Indelicato appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.850. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that the trial judge’s conclusions are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028 (Fla.1999). There is adequate record support for the trial judge’s conclusion that trial counsel’s performance did not fall below the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacOn v. State
854 So. 2d 834 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
854 So. 2d 834, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2003 WL 22148862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indelicato-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.