Indelicato v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Indelicato v. State

854 So. 2d 834, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2003 WL 22148862

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 2003·No. No. 5D02-3570·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Anthony Indelicato appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.850. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that the trial judge’s conclusions are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028 (Fla.1999). There is adequate record support for the trial judge’s conclusion that trial counsel’s performance did not fall below the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Anthony Indelicato appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.850. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that the trial judge’s conclusions are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028 (Fla.1999). There is adequate record support for the trial judge’s conclusion that trial counsel’s performance did not fall below the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Indelicato v. State, 854 So. 2d 834, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2003 WL 22148862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

854 So. 2d 834 (Indelicato v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related