Indelicato v. State
This text of 854 So. 2d 834 (Indelicato v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stephen Anthony Indelicato appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.850. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that the trial judge’s conclusions are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028 (Fla.1999). There is adequate record support for the trial judge’s conclusion that trial counsel’s performance did not fall below the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
854 So. 2d 834, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2003 WL 22148862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indelicato-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.