Indek v. Cade

Orange County Circuit Court

Indek v. Cade

25 Fla. Supp. 152

CourtCircuit Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Orange County

DecidedMay 3, 1965

DocketNo. 60400

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Fla. Supp. 152 (Indek v. Cade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Orange County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indek v. Cade, 25 Fla. Supp. 152 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER LEE McDONALD, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard before the undersigned upon the application of the defendant, Robert Bruce Cade, for partial summary judgment.

The question presented is whether or not the plaintiffs may claim damages for an aggravation of a pre-existing psychiatric problem in the absence of showing personal physical injury.

This court is of the opinion that because the evidence shows that the vehicle in which the plaintiff wife was riding collided with the defendant’s vehicle — that there was an actual physical impact between her vehicle and the defendant’s vehicle — the plaintiffs would be able to claim and recover all damages which resulted from that collision.

The record indicates that the plaintiffs may be able to show that the impact of the vehicles caused the aggravation of the preexisting condition.

For these reasons, the motion for partial summary judgment is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER LEE McDONALD, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard before the undersigned upon the application of the defendant, Robert Bruce Cade, for partial summary judgment.

The question presented is whether or not the plaintiffs may claim damages for an aggravation of a pre-existing psychiatric problem in the absence of showing personal physical injury.

This court is of the opinion that because the evidence shows that the vehicle in which the plaintiff wife was riding collided with the defendant’s vehicle — that there was an actual physical impact between her vehicle and the defendant’s vehicle — the plaintiffs would be able to claim and recover all damages which resulted from that collision.

The record indicates that the plaintiffs may be able to show that the impact of the vehicles caused the aggravation of the preexisting condition.

For these reasons, the motion for partial summary judgment is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Fla. Supp. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indek-v-cade-flacirct9ora-1965.