Indart v. Bolin Development Corp.

814 S.W.2d 750, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 816, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 99, 1991 WL 174899
Texas Supreme Court·Decided September 11, 1991·No. No. D-0967·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a fire destroyed their rental property, Ken Indart and Ziea Tabani brought an action against their landlord that included an allegation of breach of the common-law warranty of habitability. In reversing the trial court’s judgment in favor of In-dart and Tabani, the court of appeals observed that the Legislature abrogated the common-law warranty of habitability in residential tenancies, substituting in its place the statutory rights and liabilities scheme in Chapter 92 of the Texas Property Code. In denying petitioners’ application for writ of error, we should not be taken as approving or disapproving of the court of appeals’ discussion of actual damages under this statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Indart v. Bolin Development Corp., 814 S.W.2d 750, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 816, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 99, 1991 WL 174899 (Tex. 1991).

814 S.W.2d 750 (Indart v. Bolin Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.