Ind. Dist. of Mount Vernon v. Ind. Dist. of Harris Grove
This text of 65 Iowa 590 (Ind. Dist. of Mount Vernon v. Ind. Dist. of Harris Grove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The principal question presented in the record was determined by this court in Eason v. Douglass, 55 Iowa, 390. Following that case, the judgment of the district court must be affirmed. Counsel for the appellee insist that the court erred in finding for the defendants on the counter-claim. It is sufficient to say that the plaintiff has not appealed, and that the appellant is content with the finding on the counter-claim, in the event the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the other branch of the case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Iowa 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ind-dist-of-mount-vernon-v-ind-dist-of-harris-grove-iowa-1885.