Incorporated Village of Roslyn v. Koff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Incorporated Village of Roslyn v. Koff

5 A.D.2d 870, 172 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 870 (Incorporated Village of Roslyn v. Koff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Incorporated Village of Roslyn v. Koff, 5 A.D.2d 870, 172 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of a Zoning Board of Appeals, which determination denied an application for a variance and affirmed a denial by the village superintendent of buildings of an application for a license to conduct a rooming house. The appeal is from an order annulling the determination and directing the issuance of a license. The application for the license was denied by the superintendent on the sole ground that the use, which has existed since 1946, would be in violation of an amendment to the local zoning ordinance adopted November 3, 1952. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of a Zoning Board of Appeals, which determination denied an application for a variance and affirmed a denial by the village superintendent of buildings of an application for a license to conduct a rooming house. The appeal is from an order annulling the determination and directing the issuance of a license. The application for the license was denied by the superintendent on the sole ground that the use, which has existed since 1946, would be in violation of an amendment to the local zoning ordinance adopted November 3, 1952. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 870, 172 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/incorporated-village-of-roslyn-v-koff-nyappdiv-1958.