Incorporated Village of Marion v. Epler

5 Ohio St. 250
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ranney, C. J.

The question presented in this case, is not to be distinguished from that which we have just decided in the case of Hill v. Higdon. For the reasons there given, the demurrer in this case must be overruled.

Bartley, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Incorporated Village of Marion v. Epler, 5 Ohio St. 250 (Ohio 1855).

5 Ohio St. 250 (Incorporated Village of Marion v. Epler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Mayer
28 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1876)