Income Property Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Income Property Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty Corp.

88 A.D.2d 582, 449 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16749

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 582 (Income Property Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Income Property Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty Corp., 88 A.D.2d 582, 449 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Robbins, J.), dated April 23,1981, which denied their motion to vacate a default judgment which had been entered against them in the principal amount of $20,000. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In the absence of either a verified complaint or an affidavit by the party setting forth “the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due” as required by CPLR 3215 (subd [e]), the entry of a default judgment in the instant case was a nullity and must be vacated (see Natemeier v Heim, 81 AD2d 1008; Georgia Pacific Corp. v Bailey, 77 AD2d 682; Union Nat. Bank v Davis, 67 AD2d 1034), Accordingly, any consideration of the further issues of excusable default and the presence or absence of a meritorious defense has been rendered unnecessary. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.-'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Robbins, J.), dated April 23,1981, which denied their motion to vacate a default judgment which had been entered against them in the principal amount of $20,000. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In the absence of either a verified complaint or an affidavit by the party setting forth “the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due” as required by CPLR 3215 (subd [e]), the entry of a default judgment in the instant case was a nullity and must be vacated (see Natemeier v Heim, 81 AD2d 1008; Georgia Pacific Corp. v Bailey, 77 AD2d 682; Union Nat. Bank v Davis, 67 AD2d 1034), Accordingly, any consideration of the further issues of excusable default and the presence or absence of a meritorious defense has been rendered unnecessary. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.-'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 582, 449 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/income-property-consultants-inc-v-lumat-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack