Inclima v. State
629 So. 2d 927, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12021, 1993 WL 495978
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Inclima v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 625 So. 2d 978 →
Opinion
After remand the trial court reconsidered the defendant’s motion for jail time credit and denied the motion with attachments. The denial is in accordance with Inclima v. State, 625 So.2d 978 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The trial court having exercised its discretion [928]*928pursuant to Kronz v. State, 462 So.2d 450 (Fla.1985) and having denied the motion based on the fact that the defendant was incarcerated out of state, the trial court’s order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Inclima v. State, 629 So. 2d 927, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12021, 1993 WL 495978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
629 So. 2d 927 (Inclima v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kronz v. State
462 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Inclima v. State
625 So. 2d 978 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)