Incarnato v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

668 N.E.2d 920, 76 Ohio St. 3d 562, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 625
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 4, 1996
DocketNo. 96-671
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 N.E.2d 920 (Incarnato v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Incarnato v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance, 668 N.E.2d 920, 76 Ohio St. 3d 562, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 625 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Schaefer v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 553, 668 N.E.2d 913.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent. Stratton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Incarnato v. Metro. Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
1996 Ohio 373 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 N.E.2d 920, 76 Ohio St. 3d 562, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/incarnato-v-metropolitan-property-casualty-insurance-ohio-1996.