INCARDONA v. Roer
This text of 37 A.3d 746 (INCARDONA v. Roer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Karen INCARDONA, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al.
v.
David ROER et al.
Karen Incardona, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al.
v.
Saint Mary's Hospital et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Karen L. Dowd and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition.
*747 Augustus R. Southworth III, Waterbury, and Todd R. Michaels, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 33960) is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the plaintiffs' appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction?"
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A.3d 746, 304 Conn. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/incardona-v-roer-conn-2012.