INCARDONA v. Roer
37 A.3d 746, 304 Conn. 904
Opinion
Karen INCARDONA, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al.
v.
David ROER et al.
Karen Incardona, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al.
v.
Saint Mary's Hospital et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Karen L. Dowd and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition.
*747 Augustus R. Southworth III, Waterbury, and Todd R. Michaels, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 33960) is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the plaintiffs' appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction?"
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
INCARDONA v. Roer, 37 A.3d 746, 304 Conn. 904 (Colo. 2012).
37 A.3d 746 (INCARDONA v. Roer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Booth v. Park Terrace II Mutual Housing Ltd. Partnership
217 Conn. App. 398 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2023)
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasiak
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2017
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasiak
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2015
Mangiafico v. State Board of Education
53 A.3d 1066 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
Stott v. Peerless Insurance
47 A.3d 965 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Correction
37 A.3d 746 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)