Incantalupo v. City of New York

85 A.D.2d 640, 449 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16452
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1981·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the City of New York, the infant claimant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated October 21, 1980, as denied the application as to him. (The appeal on behalf of the claimant mother has been withdrawn.) Order reversed insofar as appealed from by the infant claimant, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and application granted with respect to the claim of the infant. The City’s opposition to the infant’s application and Special Term’s denial thereof were based solely upon this court’s holding in Cohen v Pearl Riv. Union Free School Dist. (70 AD2d 94), which has since been reversed by the Court of Appeals (51 NY2d 256). Further, having failed to challenge the infant’s application on the merits at Special Term, the city is not now entitled to a remand. Therefore, we not only reverse, but grant the infant’s application as well. Rabin, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Incantalupo v. City of New York, 85 A.D.2d 640, 449 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

85 A.D.2d 640 (Incantalupo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tal v. Scully
139 Misc. 2d 192 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)