Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A.

Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A.

632 So. 2d 238, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1330, 1994 WL 51806
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12491 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1994·No. No. 93-2632·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears that the petitioners and the respondents agree that the bad faith claim pending in the trial court should be abated until the conclusion of other related actions, therefore, the order denying the motion to abate is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A., 632 So. 2d 238, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1330, 1994 WL 51806 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

632 So. 2d 238 (Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.