Inabnit v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Inabnit v. State

138 S.W. 1013, 63 Tex. Crim. 88, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 375

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 23, 1911

DocketNo. 1294.

StatusPublished

This text of 138 S.W. 1013 (Inabnit v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Inabnit v. State, 138 S.W. 1013, 63 Tex. Crim. 88, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 375 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

The appellant was indicted charged with the offense of burglariously entering a private residence in the nighttime. He was convicted and sentenced to five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The caption shows that the term of court at which appellant was tried, adjourned April 1, 1911. It is also shown that the term of court lasted more than eight weeks, and defendant was tried on January 6, 1911, and sentenced on January 14, 1911. The statement of facts was not filed until May 6, 1911, not only more than thirty days from the date of the final judgment, but more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court. The motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to strike out the statement of facts is sustained.

There are no bills of exception to the admissibility of any testimony, and in the absence of a statement of facts it is presumed the court charged the law and all the law applicable to the facts. The indictment charges an offense, and the charge submits that offense to the jury. Ko question is presented that we can review in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Afirmad.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, Judge.

The appellant was indicted charged with the offense of burglariously entering a private residence in the nighttime. He was convicted and sentenced to five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The caption shows that the term of court at which appellant was tried, adjourned April 1, 1911. It is also shown that the term of court lasted more than eight weeks, and defendant was tried on January 6, 1911, and sentenced on January 14, 1911. The statement of facts was not filed until May 6, 1911, not only more than thirty days from the date of the final judgment, but more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court. The motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to strike out the statement of facts is sustained.

There are no bills of exception to the admissibility of any testimony, and in the absence of a statement of facts it is presumed the court charged the law and all the law applicable to the facts. The indictment charges an offense, and the charge submits that offense to the jury. Ko question is presented that we can review in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Afirmad.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 S.W. 1013, 63 Tex. Crim. 88, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inabnit-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.