Ina v. CV Sciences, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 9, 2022·No. 2:18-cv-01602·Unknown

Opinion

DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2

3 Case No. 2:18-cv-01602-JAD-BNW 4 In re: CV SCIENCES, INC. SECURITIES 5 LITIGATION Order Certifying Settlement Class and Preliminarily Approving Class Action 6 Settlement and Related Notices

7 This Document Relates to: All Actions ECF No. 159 8 9 WHEREAS, (i) Lead Plaintiff Richard Ina, as Trustee for the Ina Family Trust (“Lead 10 Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself and each of the Class Members; (ii) defendants CV Sciences, Inc. (“CV 11 Sciences” or the “Company”), Michael Mona, Jr., Joseph D. Dowling, and Michael Mona, III 12 (collectively “Defendants”), have entered into the Stipulation of Settlement, dated January 31, 2022 (the 13 “Stipulation”), which is subject to review under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 14 which, together with the exhibits annexed thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for the proposed 15 settlement and dismissal of the class action pending before the Court entitled In re CV Sciences, Inc. 16 Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:18-cv-01602-JAD-BNW (D. Nev.) (the “Action”); and the Court 17 having read and considered the Stipulation and the exhibits thereto and submissions made relating 18 thereto, and finding that substantial and sufficient grounds exist for entering this Order; and the Settling 19 Parties having consented to the entry of this Order; and 20 WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined, all terms used herein have the same meaning as set forth 21 in the Stipulation; 22 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The motion for preliminary approval and request to certify a settlement class 24 [ECF No. 159] is GRANTED. The proposed class action settlement, as set forth in the Stipulation 25 [ECF No. 158] is PRELIMINARILY APPROVED, subject to further consideration at the Final 26 Approval Hearing described below. 27 2. Pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for 1 of all persons who purchased the common stock of CV Sciences in the United States or on the OTC 2 between June 19, 2017, and August 20, 2018, at 1:21 p.m. EST, inclusive, and were allegedly damaged 3 thereby. Excluded from the Class are: (a) Defendants; (b) the officers and directors of the Company at 4 all relevant times; (c) members of any Defendant’s immediate families; (d) any entity in which 5 Defendants have or had a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with any of the 6 Defendants; (e) the legal representatives, heirs, agents, successors, or assigns of such excluded persons; 7 (f) Defendants’ liability insurance carriers and any affiliates or subsidiaries thereof; (g) those who 8 purchased CV Sciences common stock on foreign exchanges, in accordance with the United States 9 Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 267 (2010) (“[I]t is in 10 our view only transactions in securities listed on domestic exchanges, and domestic transactions in other 11 securities, to which §10(b) applies.”); and (h) any persons who exclude themselves by submitting a 12 request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court. 13 3. The Court finds, for the purposes of settlement only, that the prerequisites for a class 14 action under Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied in that: 15 (a) the number of Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (b) there 16 are questions of law and fact common to the Class; (c) the claims of Lead Plaintiff are typical of the 17 claims of the class he seeks to represent; (d) Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel have and will continue to 18 fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to 19 the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual Class Members; and 20 (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the 21 controversy. 22 4. Consistent with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for purposes of 23 settlement only, Lead Plaintiff is appointed as the Class Representative on behalf of the Class, and 24 Lead Counsel Faruqi & Faruqi is hereby appointed as Class Counsel. 25 5. The Final Approval Hearing will be held before this Court on July 22, 2022, at 26 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Lloyd D. George Court 27 House, 333 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89101, Courtroom 6D, to determine whether the 1 reasonable, and adequate and should be approved by the Court; whether a Judgment as provided in 2 ¶1.14 of the Stipulation should be entered; whether the proposed Plan of Allocation is fair, reasonable, 3 and adequate and should be approved; to determine the amount of fees and expenses to be awarded to 4 Class Counsel; and to determine any award to the Class Representative under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(4). 5 The Court may adjourn the Final Approval Hearing without further notice to the Members of the Class. 6 6. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Pendency and Proposed 7 Settlement of Class Action (the “Notice”), the Proof of Claim and Release form (the “Proof of Claim”), 8 and the Summary Notice annexed to ECF No. 159 as Exhibits A-1, A-2, and A-3, respectively, and 9 finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially 10 in the manner and form set forth in ¶¶11-12 of this order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil 11 Procedure 23, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and due process, and is the best 12 notice practicable under the circumstances and will constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons 13 entitled hereto. 14 7. The firm of Analytics Consulting LLC is hereby appointed as the Claims 15 Administrator to supervise and administer the notice program as well as the processing of claims as 16 more fully set forth below. 17 8. The Court approves the appointment of Huntington National Bank as the Escrow 18 Agent to manage and administer the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Class. 19 9. The Escrow Agent may, at any time after entry of this order and without further approval 20 from Defendants or the Court, disburse at the direction of Lead Counsel up to $30,000 from the 21 Settlement Fund prior to the Effective Date to pay Notice and Administration Expenses. After the 22 Effective Date, additional amounts, up to a total of $15,000, may be transferred from the Settlement 23 Fund to pay for any additional Notice and Administration Expenses without further order of the Court. 24 For any additional Notice and Administration Expenses above $45,000, Class Counsel must obtain 25 Court approval for payments out of the Settlement Fund. 26 10. Not later than seven calendar days after the Court signs and enters this Order, CV 27 Sciences must provide and/or cause its transfer agent to provide to Class Counsel transfer records for 1 format, such as an Excel spreadsheet. This information must be kept confidential and must not be used 2 for any purpose other than to provide the notice contemplated by this Order. 3 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ina v. CV Sciences, Inc., (D. Nev. 2022).

Ina v. CV Sciences, Inc. (Ina v. CV Sciences, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.
561 U.S. 247 (Supreme Court, 2010)