In The Struggle Productions LLC v. Collins

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 8, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-02776·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE STRUGGLE PRODUCTIONS LLC, Plaintiff, 24-CV-02776 (JAV) v.

ROLAND COLLINS and BSB RECORDS, NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT INC., AND ORDER LIFTING STAY Defendants.

JEANNETTE A. VARGAS, United States District Judge: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court’s Individual Practices, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jeannette-vargas. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines shall remain in effect notwithstanding the case’s reassignment.

By Orders dated November 13, 2024 (ECF No. 48), and November 21, 2024 (ECF No. 54), Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo directed counsel for all parties to appear for a settlement conference on November 21, 2024, and a telephonic conference on January 6, 2025, respectively. Pro se Defendant Roland Collins did not attend either conference. Nor has counsel for BSB Records, Inc. appeared in this case. In light of the Defendants’ failure to attend the scheduled conferences and to respond to Plaintiff’s outreach, the stay on this case is hereby LIFTED.

Accordingly, Defendants Collins and BSB Records, Inc. must file an answer to the Complaint by January 28, 2025. The parties are reminded that BSB Records, Inc., as a corporate entity, can only appear in this litigation through counsel. A failure to answer the Complaint by this deadline could result in Plaintiff moving for a default judgment against the Defendants. Should Plaintiff move for a default judgment, Defendants could be liable because they have not responded to this lawsuit by answering the Complaint. If Defendants do not participate in the lawsuit now, they would likely waive their right to raise factual or legal defenses that they may have to Plaintiff's claims.

Counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on February 18, 2025 at 11:00am. The conference will be held in Courtroom 14C, Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. All counsel must also familiarize themselves with the Court’s Individual Rules, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jeannette-vargas, and pro se litigants must familiarize themselves with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases, which are attached to this Order and available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Vargas.

All counsel are required to register promptly as filing users on the Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) system and to familiarize themselves with the SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions, which are available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf filing.php. Pro se parties are encouraged to consent to electronic service via ECF as it would ensure that the pro se party would receive documents in its case promptly by email instead of by regular mail. The consent form, along with instructions on how to fill it out, can be found at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-electronic- service-pro-se-cases. Unless and until a pro se party consents to receive electronic service, however, counsel are required to serve that pro se party with copies of documents filed with the Court and to file affidavits of such service with the Court thereafter.

The Court will set a schedule for the case at the initial case management conference. In most cases, the Court will give the parties six months (from the date of the conference) to complete all discovery and set a deadline for the filing of any motions for summary judgment 30 days after the close of discovery. In advance of the initial case management conference, the parties should, if practicable, confer with one another to determine if such a schedule would be appropriate or if there is anything unusual about the case that would require more time and be prepared to discuss those issues at the conference. The Court will issue a written order memorializing all dates and deadlines following the conference.

Attached to this Order is a Discovery Guide prepared by the Court that provides a basic overview of discovery procedures and the initial pretrial conference. The Court strongly advises Mr. Collins to read the Guide in advance of conferring with the other party or parties and in advance of the initial pretrial conference. The Guide is provided only for informational purposes and does not override or replace any orders of the Court or rules that apply to this case.

The parties are directed to confer with each other prior to the conference regarding settlement and each of the other subjects to be considered at a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by February 11, 2025, the parties each submit a letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following information in separate paragraphs:

(1) A brief statement of the nature of the action and the principal defenses thereto;

(2) A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. In any action in which subject matter jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1332, the letter must explain the basis for the parties’ belief that diversity of citizenship exists. Where any party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation and the principal place of business. In cases where any party is a partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, or trust, the letter shall state the citizenship of each of the entity’s members, shareholders, partners, and/or trustees. See, e.g., Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2000).

(3) A statement of all existing deadlines, due dates, and/or cut-off dates;

(4) A brief description of any outstanding motions;

(5) A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place and of any discovery that is necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations;

(6) A list of all prior settlement discussions, including the date, the parties involved, and the approximate duration of such discussions, if any;

(7) A statement confirming that the parties have discussed the use of alternate dispute resolution mechanisms and indicating whether the parties believe that (a) a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge; (b) participation in the District’s Mediation Program; and/or (c) retention of a privately retained mediator would be appropriate and, if so, when in the case (e.g., within the next sixty days; after the deposition of plaintiff is completed; after the close of fact discovery; etc.) the use of such a mechanism would be appropriate; and

(8) Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.

Pursuant to the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases, a copy of which is attached to this Order, all communications with the Court by a pro se party — including the aforementioned letter — should be filed with the Pro Se Intake Unit by either (1) emailing the communication as an attachment in PDF format to Pro Se Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov (for instructions, see https://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/instructions-filing-documents-email); or (2) mailing the communication to the Pro Se Intake Unit, Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007.1 No documents or court filings should be sent directly to Chambers. Copies of correspondence between a pro se party and counsel shall not be sent to the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In The Struggle Productions LLC v. Collins, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

In The Struggle Productions LLC v. Collins (In The Struggle Productions LLC v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.