In the Matters of C.L.C.
628 S.E.2d 760
Opinion
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Matters of C.L.C., 628 S.E.2d 760 (N.C. 2006).
628 S.E.2d 760 (In the Matters of C.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.