In the Matter of Zalmen A. Dunn, Bankrupt. Zalmen A. Dunn v. Samuel A. Arutt
This text of 404 F.2d 338 (In the Matter of Zalmen A. Dunn, Bankrupt. Zalmen A. Dunn v. Samuel A. Arutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
404 F.2d 338
In the Matter of Zalmen A. Dunn, Bankrupt.
Zalmen A. DUNN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Samuel A. ARUTT, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 173, Docket 32710.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 13, 1968.
Decided Nov. 21, 1968.
Elias Mann, New York City (Charles H. Weintraub and Levin & Weintraub, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellant.
Jacob F. Gottesman, New York City, for respondent-appellee.
Before MEDINA, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, the bankrupt, appeals from an order of Chief Judge Zavatt of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Judge Zavatt's order affirmed an order of the referee in bankruptcy, which denied the bankrupt's motion to dismiss specifications of objections to the bankrupt's discharge which had been signed by the trustee's attorney and not by the trustee personally.
We affirm on the opinion of Referee William J. Rudin below.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
404 F.2d 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-zalmen-a-dunn-bankrupt-zalmen-a-dunn-v-samuel-a-ca2-1968.