in the Matter of X.M.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 25, 2019
Docket07-19-00046-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of X.M. (in the Matter of X.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of X.M., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-19-00046-CV ________________________

IN THE MATTER OF X.M.

On Appeal from the 99th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-764,893; Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding

June 25, 2019

ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

Appellant, X.M.,1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding that he engaged in

delinquent conduct and the court’s order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice

Department for a period of twenty-five years. We remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings.

1 To protect the privacy of the minor involved, we refer to him by his initials. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(c). Appellant’s brief was originally due April 10, 2019. We granted appellant’s

counsel, Mr. Charles Blevins, an extension to June 3 to file a brief. By letter of June 10,

we notified Appellant’s counsel that the brief was overdue and directed him to file a brief

by June 20. To date, counsel has not filed a brief or made any response to the court’s

letter.

A juvenile in a delinquency case is entitled to representation by counsel at every

stage of the proceedings, including appeal. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 51.10; 56.01(d)

(West Supp. 2018). This right to representation includes the right to effective assistance

of counsel. In re K.J.O., 27 S.W.3d 340, 342 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, pet. denied)

(citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674

(1984)). A juvenile is guaranteed the same constitutional right to effective assistance of

counsel which he would have as an adult in a criminal proceeding. Id.

Because Appellant’s counsel has not filed an appellate brief, we deem it

appropriate to abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(2); In re M.A.D., 167 S.W.3d 938, 939 (Tex.

App.—Waco 2005, order) (per curiam) (remanding juvenile delinquency case for

appointment of new counsel where appellant’s counsel failed to timely file an appellate

brief). Upon remand, the trial court shall determine why counsel has failed to file

Appellant’s brief and take such action as is necessary to ensure that the brief is filed in

accordance with this opinion.

Should counsel file Appellant’s brief on or before July 8, 2019, he is directed to

immediately notify the trial court, in writing, of the filing, whereupon the trial court shall not

2 be required to take further action. If, however, the brief is not filed by that date, the trial

court is directed to conduct a hearing on or before July 29, 2019, to determine the

following:

1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether Appellant’s present counsel has abandoned the appeal entitling Appellant to new counsel; and

3. whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to the appointment of counsel. 2

Should it be determined that Appellant wants to continue the appeal, is indigent,

and entitled to appointed counsel, the name, address, email address, telephone number,

and State Bar of Texas identification number of any new counsel shall be provided to the

clerk of this court. The trial court shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of law and

shall cause its findings, conclusions, and any necessary orders to be included in a

supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court by August 12, 2019.

New counsel, if any, shall file Appellant’s brief thirty days after the date of engagement or

appointment; however, should Mr. Blevins be allowed to remain as counsel, he is hereby

ordered to file Appellant’s brief instanter.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2Effective assistance cannot be afforded without requiring that counsel file a brief on an appellant’s behalf. See Guillory v. State, 557 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Guillory v. State
557 S.W.2d 118 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
In re K.J.O.
27 S.W.3d 340 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
In re M.A.D.
167 S.W.3d 938 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of X.M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-xm-texapp-2019.