In the Matter of Wolfe

950 N.E.2d 301, 2011 Ind. LEXIS 636, 2011 WL 2936211
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 20, 2011
Docket27S00-1106-DI-324
StatusPublished

This text of 950 N.E.2d 301 (In the Matter of Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Wolfe, 950 N.E.2d 301, 2011 Ind. LEXIS 636, 2011 WL 2936211 (Ind. 2011).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF GUILTY FINDING

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2S(ll.l)(a), files a “Notice of Guilty Finding and Request for Suspension,” asking that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this State, pending further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, due to Respondent being found guilty of a crime punishable as a felony.

The Court, being duly advised and upon careful consideration of all materials submitted, now finds that Respondent has been found guilty of three counts of class D felony theft.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent is suspended pendente lite from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately. Respondent is already under a suspension for nonpayment of his annual registration fee, effective May 26, 2011. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the continuing duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). The interim suspension shall continue until further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, provided no other suspension is in effect.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order by certified or registered mail to the Respondent or Respondent’s attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the Court’s website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Lambka
950 N.E.2d 301 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 N.E.2d 301, 2011 Ind. LEXIS 636, 2011 WL 2936211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-wolfe-ind-2011.