In the Matter of Weinberg

California Court of Appeal

In the Matter of Weinberg

171 P. 110, 35 Cal. App. 806

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 9, 1918

DocketCrim. No. 723.

StatusPublished

This text of 171 P. 110 (In the Matter of Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Weinberg, 171 P. 110, 35 Cal. App. 806 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant is restrained of his liberty under a bench warrant issued out of the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco, upon eight separate indictments presented by the grand jury in cases entitled' “The People of the State of California v. Israel Weinberg,” numbered 7530 to 7537, inclusive, wherein the defendant was charged with the murder of eight different persons. Upon one of these indictments only the defendant has.been tried and acquitted by a jury. The record of that case is 'before us, as are also the proceedings before the grand jury in each of these several indictments which have not yet been put to trial.

We are of the opinion that the rule adopted in the'matter of Ex. parte Rena Mooney, No. 709, ante, p. 797, [171 Pac. 109], as well as the reason for its application, are to be given full application to the instant case. Upon the reasoning and authorities in the ease of Ex parte Bena Mooney, supra, the application herein will be denied and the petitioner remanded, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The defendant is restrained of his liberty under a bench warrant issued out of the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco, upon eight separate indictments presented by the grand jury in cases entitled' “The People of the State of California v. Israel Weinberg,” numbered 7530 to 7537, inclusive, wherein the defendant was charged with the murder of eight different persons. Upon one of these indictments only the defendant has.been tried and acquitted by a jury. The record of that case is 'before us, as are also the proceedings before the grand jury in each of these several indictments which have not yet been put to trial.

We are of the opinion that the rule adopted in the'matter of Ex. parte Rena Mooney, No. 709, ante, p. 797, [171 Pac. 109], as well as the reason for its application, are to be given full application to the instant case. Upon the reasoning and authorities in the ease of Ex parte Bena Mooney, supra, the application herein will be denied and the petitioner remanded, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 P. 110, 35 Cal. App. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-weinberg-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack