In THE MATTER OF WAYMON SIMS (Two Cases)
This text of 313 Ga. 117 (In THE MATTER OF WAYMON SIMS (Two Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
313 Ga. 117 FINAL COPY
S22Y0395, S22Y0396. IN THE MATTER OF WAYMON SIMS (two cases).
PER CURIAM.
These disciplinary matters are before the Court on the report
of special master Catherine H. Hicks, who recommends that this
Court accept the petitions for voluntary surrender of license filed by
respondent Waymon Sims (State Bar No. 648825) after the filing of
a formal complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227 (c). In his petitions, filed in
State Disciplinary Board Docket (“SDBD”) Nos. 7294 and 7316, Sims
requested that he be allowed to voluntarily surrender his license for
his admitted violations of Rules 1.5 (c) (1), 1.15 (I) (a), 1.15 (II) (a),
1.15 (II) (b), 1.15 (II) (c) (1) (i), 1.15 (III) (a), and 1.15 (III) (b) (2) of
the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. See Bar Rule 4-102 (d).
While the maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.5 (c) (1) is a
public reprimand, the maximum penalty for a violation of the
remainder of the rules is disbarment. The State Bar responded to both petitions and recommends
that they be accepted. The special master then issued a single
report, recommending the Court accept the petitions. With regard
to SDBD No. 7294, the special master made the following findings
of fact. Sims, who has been a member of the State Bar since 1979,
was retained to represent a client in a claim for injuries she
sustained in an automobile accident. However, Sims’s retainer
agreement with the client failed to state clearly that litigation and
other expenses would be deducted after the contingency fee was
calculated. After Sims settled the client’s case, he deposited the
funds into an account ending in 1392. It was discovered that Sims
commingled and maintained personal and client funds in account
1392 and that he used account 1392 in multiple ways, including as
a business account.
With regard to SDBD No. 7316, the special master found that
Sims commingled and maintained personal and client funds in his
Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (“IOLTA”) ending in 4777, his
trust account ending in 1392, his IOLTA ending in 1384, his trust
2 account ending in 6273, and his trust account ending in 2366. In
addition, Sims held client funds in accounts ending in 1392 and
6273; neither account properly constituted a trust account because
the interest from those accounts did not go to the client or the
Georgia Bar Foundation; and Sims disbursed funds to clients from
account 1392. Moreover, Sims deposited personal funds into a trust
account, failed to deposit client funds into and administer client
funds from a properly constituted trust account, and withdrew funds
to pay for personal and business obligations from a trust account.
Specifically, from July 2016 to December 2018, Sims deposited client
funds into account 1392, which was not properly established as a
trust account; in the same period of time, he held funds in accounts
ending in 1392 and 4777; and he paid contractors and other
expenses from accounts ending in 1392 and 4777. Sims also
maintained personal funds in and used funds from accounts 1392
and 6273 to pay personal and business expenses, and while account
1392 was designated as a trust account, it was used for multiple
purposes.
3 The special master agreed with Sims that his conduct
constituted a violation of Rules 1.5 (c) (1), 1.15 (I) (a), 1.15 (II) (a),
1.15 (II) (b), 1.15 (II) (c) (1) (i), 1.15 (III) (a), and 1.15 (III) (b) (2).
She also noted that previous disciplinary cases addressing violations
of Rules 1.5, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), and 1.15 (III) have resulted in
disbarment. See In the Matter of Turner, 311 Ga. 204 (857 SE2d
197) (2021) (disbarring attorney who violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 (I)
(a), 1.15 (I) (c), 1.15 (II) (b), 1.15 (III) (b) (1), 1.15 (III) (e), 8.4 (a) (4),
and 9.3, and who, among other things, failed to maintain complete
records for his trust account, to keep records to reflect at all times
the exact balance held for each client or third person, and to properly
designate his trust account, and where attorney withdrew funds
from his trust account for his own personal use); In the Matter of
Berry, 310 Ga. 158, 159 (848 SE2d 71) (2020) (disbarring an attorney
who violated Rules 1.2 (a), 1.3, 1.4 (a), 1.5 (b), 1.5 (c) (2), 1.15 (I) (a),
1.15 (I) (b), and 8.4 (a) (4), where the attorney failed to maintain
records related to funds that he received for the benefit of his client
in connection with the settlement of her personal injury claim and
4 misappropriated the funds that he was supposed to remit to a
provider on her behalf). Accordingly, the special master
recommended that the Court accept Sims’s petitions for voluntary
surrender of his license.
We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Sims’s
petitions for voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount
to disbarment. See Bar Rule 4-110 (f). Accordingly, it is ordered
that the name of Waymon Sims be removed from the rolls of persons
authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Sims is reminded
of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (b).
Voluntary surrender of license accepted. All the Justices concur.
5 Decided January 19, 2022.
Voluntary surrender of license.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, William D.
NeSmith III, Deputy General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K.
Mittelman, Andreea N. Morrison, Assistant General Counsel State
Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Christine A. Kohler, for Sims.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 Ga. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-waymon-sims-two-cases-ga-2022.