In the Matter of Wasserstrum

929 A.2d 1091, 192 N.J. 397, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1062
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 10, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-064, concluding that SEYMOUR WASSERSTRUM of VINELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(c)(fail-ure to memorialize fee agreement) and RPC 1.2(c)(failure to allocate responsibility for transferred cases and to obtain client’s consent to reduced scope of representation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SEYMOUR WASSERSTRUM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *398 expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Wasserstrum, 929 A.2d 1091, 192 N.J. 397, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1062 (N.J. 2007).

929 A.2d 1091 (In the Matter of Wasserstrum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pryor v. Department of Corrections
929 A.2d 1091 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)