In the Matter of Wankel
714 N.W.2d 350, 475 Mich. 878
This text of 714 N.W.2d 350 (In the Matter of Wankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In the Matter of Wankel, 714 N.W.2d 350, 475 Mich. 878 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
In re Justin Michael WANKEL, Jacob Blei Wankel, Alyssa Lee Wankel, and Chelsea Renae Mott, Minors.
Department of Human Services, f/k/a Family Independence Agency, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Erin Wankel, Respondent-Appellant, and
David Mott, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dorman v. Township of Clinton
714 N.W.2d 350 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
714 N.W.2d 350, 475 Mich. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-wankel-mich-2006.