In the Matter of US Truck Company, Inc.

49 B.R. 604
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedApril 11, 1985
DocketBankruptcy Case No. 82-03561-BE, Civ. A. Nos. 84CV-3014-AA, 84CV-7297-AA
StatusPublished

This text of 49 B.R. 604 (In the Matter of US Truck Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of US Truck Company, Inc., 49 B.R. 604 (E.D. Mich. 1985).

Opinion

49 B.R. 604 (1985)

In The Matter of U.S. TRUCK COMPANY, INC., A Michigan Corporation, Debtor.

Bankruptcy Case No. 82-03561-BE, Civ. A. Nos. 84CV-3014-AA, 84CV-7297-AA.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

April 11, 1985.

*605 Ronald M. Baugh, Hertzberg, Jacob & Weingarten, P.C., Detroit, Mich., for Unsecured Creditors' Committee.

Joseph S. Radom, P.C., Southfield, Mich., for debtor.

James P. Hoffa, Hoffa, Chodak & Robiner, Detroit, Mich., for Teamsters' Union.

ORDER

CHARLES W. JOINER, District Judge.

These consolidated cases are before the court on parallel appeals from an order of the Bankruptcy Court, denying the motions of the debtor and the unsecured creditors committee to permit the Brent Company to purchase the undisputed and liquidated unsecured claims of the bankruptcy estate at 40% of their allowed amounts. 42 B.R. 787 (D.E.Mich.1984).

Since these appeals were briefed and argued, Judge Pratt, who has taken over the bankruptcy proceedings following the departure of Judge Bernstein, has accepted the debtor's fourth proposed plan of reorganization. This plan provides for redemption of the unsecured claims at a value higher than that in Brent's offer to purchase. Consequently, the appeals are rendered moot by the bankruptcy court's acceptance of the plan of reorganization. However, because this court has serious questions concerning Judge Bernstein's memorandum opinion and order denying appellant's motion below, that opinion is hereby set aside, and is deemed to have no precedential value.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re U.S. Truck Co.
42 B.R. 787 (E.D. Michigan, 1984)
In re U.S. Truck Co.
49 B.R. 604 (E.D. Michigan, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 B.R. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-us-truck-company-inc-mied-1985.