In the Matter of Tremaine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In the Matter of Tremaine

889 A.2d 1164, 585 Pa. 650, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3273

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 22, 2005·No. No. 101 DB 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of [1165] the Disciplinary Board dated November 22, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that DEGAS GRANDVIL TRE-MAINE, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of [1165] the Disciplinary Board dated November 22, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that DEGAS GRANDVIL TRE-MAINE, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

In the Matter of Tremaine, 889 A.2d 1164, 585 Pa. 650, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3273 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

889 A.2d 1164 (In the Matter of Tremaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related