in the Matter of the Marriage of Wolff
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00057-CV
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LYN M. WOLFF AND JASON W. WOLFF
From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-CI-22278 Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 22, 2021
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
Appellant Lyn M. Wolff seeks to appeal the trial court’s final divorce decree signed on
November 6, 2020. A notice of appeal was due to be filed on December 7, 2020, within thirty
days after the judgment was signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline for filing a notice of
appeal may be extended by the timely filing of a motion for new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).
Appellant filed a motion for new trial on December 10, 2020, more than thirty days after the
judgment was signed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a) (a motion for new trial must be filed within
thirty days after the judgment). Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial,
appellant’s notice of appeal was due no later than December 7, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on February 22, 2021. We therefore issued an order 04-21-00057-CV
instructing appellant to respond in writing stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack
of jurisdiction.
Appellant responded by stating that her motion for new trial was timely e-filed on
December 4, 2020, but the file size was too large and the filing was rejected. The motion for new
trial was resubmitted and successfully e-filed on December 10, 2020. Appellant requests that we
deem the motion for new trial as timely filed on December 4, 2020 and similarly deem her notice
of appeal as timely filed. In the alternative, appellant requests that we grant an extension of time
to file the notice of appeal.
Assuming that appellant’s motion for new trial was timely filed on December 4, 2020, her
notice of appeal would have been due on February 4, 2021. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). As noted,
appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on February 22, 2021. Rule 26.3 authorizes an appellate
court to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the appellant files both the notice of appeal and
a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline for
filing the notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. A motion for extension of time is necessarily
implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed
by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3. See Verburgt v.
Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But, “once the
period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no
longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id. Here, appellant’s notice of appeal was not
filed within the fifteen-day grace period. See id. Appellant has failed to establish that this court
has jurisdiction. Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(a).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Matter of the Marriage of Wolff (in the Matter of the Marriage of Wolff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.