in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall Edwards, and in the Interest of Casey Alan Edwards and Brittany Nicole Edwards, Minor Children

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall Edwards, and in the Interest of Casey Alan Edwards and Brittany Nicole Edwards, Minor Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 13, 2002·No. 06-02-00094-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-02-00094-CV

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

SHANNON WAYNETTE EDWARDS AND

ALAN RANDALL EDWARDS

AND IN THE INTEREST OF CASEY ALAN EDWARDS AND

BRITTNEY NICOLE EDWARDS, MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 202nd Judicial District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 99D0775-202

Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.

Opinion by Justice Grant

O P I N I O N

Shannon Waynette Edwards, appellant, has filed a motion asking this court to dismiss her appeal because she no longer wishes to prosecute her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Ben Z. Grant

Justice

Date Submitted: September 12, 2002

Date Decided: September 13, 2002

Do Not Publish

nt-family: Times New Roman">Anders, also filed a motion to withdraw. Counsel sent Holman a copy of the appellate brief and informed Holman of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record.

This Court informed Holman at that time that his response, if any, was due within thirty days. Holman has since requested two extensions of time to file his response brief. We granted both requests, but as of this date, Holman has not filed a pro se response. Nor has the State filed a brief in this case.

We have independently reviewed the record in this case and concur with counsel's assessment that there are no meritorious points of error that may be raised. Since the briefs and arguments raised

therein are identical in each appeal, for the reasons stated in Claveton Holman v. The State of Texas, No. 06-02-00182-CR, we likewise affirm the trial court's judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: May 28, 2003

Date Decided: July 8, 2003

Do Not Publish

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-02-00094-CV

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

SHANNON WAYNETTE EDWARDS AND

ALAN RANDALL EDWARDS

AND IN THE INTEREST OF CASEY ALAN EDWARDS AND

BRITTNEY NICOLE EDWARDS, MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 202nd Judicial District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 99D0775-202

Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.

Opinion by Justice Grant

O P I N I O N

Shannon Waynette Edwards, appellant, has filed a motion asking this court to dismiss her appeal because she no longer wishes to prosecute her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Ben Z. Grant

Justice

Date Submitted: September 12, 2002

Date Decided: September 13, 2002

Do Not Publish

nt-family: Times New Roman">Anders, also filed a motion to withdraw. Counsel sent Holman a copy of the appellate brief and informed Holman of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record.

This Court informed Holman at that time that his response, if any, was due within thirty days. Holman has since requested two extensions of time to file his response brief. We granted both requests, but as of this date, Holman has not filed a pro se response. Nor has the State filed a brief in this case.

We have independently reviewed the record in this case and concur with counsel's assessment that there are no meritorious points of error that may be raised. Since the briefs and arguments raised

therein are identical in each appeal, for the reasons stated in Claveton Holman v. The State of Texas, No. 06-02-00182-CR, we likewise affirm the trial court's judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: May 28, 2003

Date Decided: July 8, 2003

Do Not Publish

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall Edwards, and in the Interest of Casey Alan Edwards and Brittany Nicole Edwards, Minor Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall Edwards, and in the Interest of Casey Alan Edwards and Brittany Nicole Edwards, Minor Children (in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall Edwards, and in the Interest of Casey Alan Edwards and Brittany Nicole Edwards, Minor Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related