in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Oliver and Richard Oliver and in the Interest of P.O., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 19, 2018
Docket07-18-00177-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Oliver and Richard Oliver and in the Interest of P.O., a Child (in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Oliver and Richard Oliver and in the Interest of P.O., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Oliver and Richard Oliver and in the Interest of P.O., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00177-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF SHANNON OLIVER AND RICHARD OLIVER

On Appeal from the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas1 Trial Court No. D1314898, Honorable Donald Kraemer, Presiding

June 19, 2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.

Appellant, Richard Oliver, filed a notice of appeal from the Final Decree of Divorce

on March 13, 2018. The clerk’s record was due on April 10, 2018, but was not filed. On

May 10, 2018, the district clerk notified the Clerk of this Court that Oliver had not made

payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of

May 11, 2018, we directed Oliver to make acceptable payment arrangements for the

1By order of the Texas Supreme Court, this appeal was transferred from the Tenth Court of Appeals to this Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). clerk’s record by May 21. Failure to do so, we admonished, would subject the appeal to

dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

To date, Oliver has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or filed

any response to the Court’s letter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution and because Oliver failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules

and an order of the Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Oliver and Richard Oliver and in the Interest of P.O., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-shannon-oliver-and-richard-oliver-and-in-texapp-2018.