In the Matter of the Marriage of Roxanna Hernandez and Alex Hernandez Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Matter of the Marriage of Roxanna Hernandez and Alex Hernandez Jr. v. the State of Texas (In the Matter of the Marriage of Roxanna Hernandez and Alex Hernandez Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-23-00580-CV, 13-23-00582-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ROXANNA HERNANDEZ AND ALEX HERNANDEZ JR.
On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
Alex Hernandez Jr. filed a “Motion for Interlocutory Appeal[,] Notice of
Mandamus[,] and Motion to Stay” in this Court on December 14, 2023. We construed this
pleading as both a notice of appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus and docketed it
in two cause numbers: 13-23-00580-CV for the petition for writ of mandamus, and 13-23-
00582-CV for the appeal. On December 15, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified
Hernandez that it appeared that there was not a final, appealable order, that there was
no statutory basis for an interlocutory appeal, and that a notice of interlocutory appeal would be untimely. The Clerk advised Hernandez that the appeal would be dismissed if
these defects were not corrected within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1. The Clerk
further advised Hernandez that the petition for writ of mandamus failed to comply with the
appellate rules and directed him to file an amended petition within five days. See id. R.
9.4(i)(3), 52.3, 52.7. And finally, the Clerk informed Hernandez that the motion for stay
failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 10.1, 52.10(a).
Hernandez has not responded to the Clerk’s directives and has not otherwise corrected
any of these defects.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the
applicable law, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed and the petition for
writ of mandamus should be denied. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in cause number
13-23-00582-CV and we deny the petition for writ of mandamus in cause number 13-23-
00580-CV. We dismiss the motion to stay as moot in both cases.
GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice
Delivered and filed on the 11th day of January, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of the Marriage of Roxanna Hernandez and Alex Hernandez Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-roxanna-hernandez-and-alex-hernandez-jr-texapp-2024.