In the Matter of the Marriage of Kristin Kay Wilkinson and Robert Alan Wilkinson and in the Interest of R.B.W., K.K.W., and B.K.W., Children v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Matter of the Marriage of Kristin Kay Wilkinson and Robert Alan Wilkinson and in the Interest of R.B.W., K.K.W., and B.K.W., Children v. the State of Texas (In the Matter of the Marriage of Kristin Kay Wilkinson and Robert Alan Wilkinson and in the Interest of R.B.W., K.K.W., and B.K.W., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00375-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF KRISTIN KAY WILKINSON AND ROBERT ALAN WILKINSON AND IN THE INTEREST OF R.B.W., K.K.W., AND B.K.W., CHILDREN
ON APPEAL FROM THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT OF VICTORIA COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal. On
December 19, 2024, this Court issued a supplemental order of abatement order “so that
the trial court may consider appellant’s request to reduce the amount necessary to post
a superseadeas bond.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.2(b). On March 28, 2025, appellant filed a
motion to dismiss, stating that “[a]fter much deliberation and consultation with his attorney, [he] has decided to cease from pursuing this appeal” and “plans to file for
bankruptcy protection” instead. Appellee did not file a response.
Having considered the documents on file and the unopposed motion, this Court is
of the opinion that the motion should be granted, and the appeal should be dismissed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant the motion to
dismiss, and dismiss the appeal. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d)
(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having
dismissed the appeal pursuant to appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained.
JAIME TIJERINA Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the 17th day of April, 2025.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of the Marriage of Kristin Kay Wilkinson and Robert Alan Wilkinson and in the Interest of R.B.W., K.K.W., and B.K.W., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-kristin-kay-wilkinson-and-robert-alan-texapp-2025.